NOTICE OF THESIS EXAM
ERRICHA FEBRIANTY
202200010012
JULY 22, 2026, 09:00 AM
Building C, 7th fl., Room: C706
Adviser : Ekarina, Ph. D.
Examiners : Ferdinan Okki
Kurniawan, Ph.D. & Dr. Engliana, M.Hum.
Title
CONTRASTIVE
ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH REFERRING
EXPRESSION USAGE PATTERNS BY
INDONESIAN
LEARNERS
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze patterns of the use
of referring expressions in English by Indonesian EFL learners at two
proficiency levels—Beginner and Intermediate—based on the Givenness Hierarchy
framework developed by Gundel, Hedberg, and Zacharski (1993, 2006). This study
employs a mixed-methods approach that combines qualitative analysis to identify
the type of cognitive status for each referring expression in the data, as well
as quantitative analysis to calculate and compare the frequency of each
cognitive status across the Beginner and Intermediate groups.
The research data were obtained from 40
transcripts of oral storytelling based on a series of pictures produced by 20
Indonesian EFL learners, with each learner producing two stories based on two
different picture topics. All data were analyzed using the coding protocol by
Gundel et al. (2006) to classify each referential expression into six cognitive
status categories: IN FOCUS, ACTIVATED, FAMILIAR, UNIQUELY IDENTIFIABLE,
REFERENTIAL, and TYPE IDENTIFIABLE.
The results of the analysis showed that of the
total 689 referential expressions identified, the IN FOCUS status was the most
dominant at 51.67%, followed by REFERENTIAL (20.03%), UNIQUELY IDENTIFIABLE
(15.09%), ACTIVATED (9.29%), and FAMILIAR (3.92%). The TYPE IDENTIFIABLE status
was not found at all in the entire dataset. A comparison between the two groups
shows that the Intermediate group used the ACTIVATED status at a much higher
rate (12.93%) than the Beginner group (3.94%). In contrast, the Beginner group
exhibited a higher proportion of REFERENTIAL (27.60%) compared to the Intermediate
group (14.88%). The forms of deictics found in the IN FOCUS category include
personal pronouns such as he, she, they, his, her, and their, as well as
character names used repeatedly. The REFERENTIAL category is dominated by indefinite
noun phrases with the articles a or an, while the UNIQUELY IDENTIFIABLE and
ACTIVATED categories are dominated by definite noun phrases with the article
the, derived through bridging inference or situational context.
The qualitative analysis also identified several
deviations from the standard Givenness Hierarchy, including inconsistencies in
the use of gender pronouns (he and she)—particularly among Beginners—the
omission of articles in newly introduced noun phrases, and the phenomenon of
overexplicitness, characterized by the repetition of full noun phrases in
contexts where pronouns should have been used. These deviations were
interpreted through various theoretical frameworks of second language
acquisition, including Krashen’s Input Hypothesis (1985), Selinker’s
Interlanguage Theory (1972), Swain’s Output Hypothesis (1985, 1995), as well as
the Global Englishes Language Teaching (GELT) framework by Rose and Galloway
(2019) and the concept of intelligibility in the context of English as a Lingua
Franca by Jenkins (2000) and Deterding (2013).
The findings of this study indicate that the
process of mastering referential expressions in English by Indonesian learners
is gradual, progressing from basic abilities in introducing and maintaining
referents to more complex abilities in activating referents through situational
contexts. This study has significant pedagogical implications for English
language instruction in Indonesia, particularly in developing students’
discourse competencies oriented toward communicative effectiveness in the
context of global English.
Keywords: reference expressions, Givenness Hierarchy, Indonesian EFL learners, contrastive
analysis, cognitive status, second language acquisition, discourse competence